HolyKnight
Article Page
 
JESS

Journal of Education and Social Science

ISSN:

Social science in education and curricular development receive wide attention by many researchers and educational institutions. Each social science has its own knowledge, information, skills, perspectives and methods of investigation. Selecting, organizing and presenting social science in textbooks is a major challenge for curriculum developers, for example. The objective of this journal is to bring together research contributions on the guidelines, design, specification, and implementation of rules, architectures, protocol for current and future technological innovation for education and social science.

Topics:

  • Adult and continuing education
  • Contrast education
  • Early childhood education
  • Education policy and implementation
  • Educational Science
  • Educational Communication and Terminology
  • Education measurement and evaluation
  • Information and Communication Technology on Education
  • Language education
  • Language and creative writing
  • Inclusive Education
  • ICT in Education
  • Economics of Education
  • The role psychology in education
  • Education Leadership and Management
  • Sociology of Education
  • Pedagogy
  • Guidelines
     
    Suggestions for Lecture Assessment Items in College Settings
    Volume 1, No. 1, June 2020 | 8 pages| http//dx.doi.org/10.46410/jess.2020.1.1.02

    Authors

    Pyong Ho Kim, Woosong University, Korea


    Abstract

    Lecture assessments in higher education settings are widely practiced to measure teaching quality and to improve professors’ instructional skills. Though the majority of universities in South Korea currently performs the assessments, they do not tend to thoroughly assess lecture types other than theory-based ones. The aim of the study is to provide a series of questioning items for each of various lecture types conducted in college settings, including flipped learning, discussion-based lectures, and problem-based learning, etc. Extracting data from 11 legitimate journal publishers and four university-based websites on teaching methods and higher education, the study investigated 34 articles published since 2013 in relation to lecture assessments. Results suggested different lecture assessment items that well match distinct features each lecture type entails; college instructors are encouraged to apply the findings to their specific lecture types accordingly. Further implications are made based on the lecture assessment items that the study suggests.


    Keywords

    college education, course evaluation items, application for lectures, course types.


    References

    [1] Ozcan, K. Student evaluation of lecture and teaching effectiveness in higher education. Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp.379-389, (2013)

    [2] Wachtel, H.K. Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, 191-212, (1998)

    [3] Nam, M.W. & Cho, E.S. Analysis of ‘Better Class’ Characteristics and Patterns from College Lecture Evaluation by Longitudinal Big Data. International Journal of Contents, Vol. 15, No. 3, 7-12, (2019).

    [4] Park, H.R. A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Tool in Higher Education-A case of improvement of a lecture evaluation questionnaire. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 13, No. 11, 5033-5043, (2012)

    [5] Roopa, S., Bagavad-Geetha, M., Rani, A., & Chacko, T. What type of lectures students want? A reaction evaluation of dental students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol. 7, No. 10, 2244-2246, (2013)

    [6] Emery, C.R., Kramer, T.R., & Tian, R.G. Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, 37-46, (2003)

    [7] Ko, E.M., Lee, H.K., and Han, E.O. A Study for Development of the Course Evaluation Tool for College Lecture Types. The Journal of Humanities, Vol. 31, pp.365-394, (2013)

    [8] English, J. & English, T. Combining summative and Formative Evaluation using Automated Assessment. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 141-151, (2019)

    [9] Lee, J.G. A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Questionnaire in the University. Korean Journal of General Education, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp.247-274, (2013)

    [10] Kokubo, Y., Suzuki, M., Nagata, M., Sato, K., Kawatsuki, N., & Uchida, H. Lecture Evaluation Questionnaire Items Desired by the Alumni of the Faculty. Journal of JSEE, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp.149-154, (2006)

    [11] Park, S.M. A Study for Development and Validation of the ‘Course Evaluation’ Scale for Learner-centered. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.13-22, (2011)

    [12] Green, A.J., Tanford, S., & Swfit, A. Determinants of student satisfaction with using instructional technology: The role of active learning. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp.1-10, (2018)

    [13] Feistauer, D. & Richter, T. How reliable are students’ evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1263-1279, (2017)

    [14] Amuche, A.C.I. & Umar, M.H. Development and Validation of Lecturer Teaching Assessment Scale for Nigerian Universities. Development, Vol. 10, No. 5, 58-69, (2019)

    [15] Park, S.M. A Study for Development and Validation of the ‘Course Evaluation’ Scale for Learner-centered. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.13-22, (2011)

    [16] Spehl, M.S., Straub, C., Heinzmann, A., & Bode, S.F. Student-perceived exam difficulty may trump the effects of different quality improvement measures regarding the students’ evaluation of a pediatric lecture series. BMC Medical Education, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.206-213, (2019)

    [17] Mohammed, T.A. & Pandhiani, S.M. Analysis of factors affecting student evaluation of teaching effectiveness in Saudi higher education: the case of Jubail University college. American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp.464-475, (2017)

    [18] Yew, T.M., Jen, L.S., Dawood, F.K., & Hoay, K.C. Designing an Instrument for Providing Better Student Feedback on Teaching Effectiveness. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 1, 14-22, (2018)

    [19] Anshuman, N., Shashikala, P., & Brijesh, M. Improvement of Quality of Lecture by Feedback from Students. International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, Vol. 4, No. 12, pp.694-695, (2019)

    [20] Cho, J.S. Determinants of Student Course Evaluation Using Hierarchical Linear Model. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.1285-1296, (2013)

    [21] Carlfjord, S., Roback, K., and Nilsen, P. Five Years’ Experience of an Annual Course on Implementation Science: An Evaluation among Course Participants. Implementation Science, Vol. 12, No.1, pp.101-108, (2017)

    [22] Arreola, R.A. Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System. Magna Publications, 2004: Madison, WI, USA.

    [23] DiVall, M., Barr, J., Gonyeau, M., Matthews, S.J., van Amburgh, J., Qualters, D., and Trujillo, J. Follow-up Assessment of a Faculty Peer Observation and Evaluation Program. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp.1-7, (2012)

    [24] Ojennus, D.D. Assessment of Learning Gains in a Flipped Biochemistry Classroom. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(1), 20-27, (2016)

    [25] Davies, M., Hirschberg, J., Lye, J., Johnston, C., and McDonald, I. Is It Your Fault? Influences on Student Evaluations on Teaching in Tertiary Institutions. Australian Journal of Education, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp.1-16, (2005)

    [26] Kifle, T. & Alauddin, M. What Determines Students’ Perceptions in Course Evaluation Rating in Higher Education? An Econometric Exploration. Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 52, pp.123-130, (2016)

    [27] Hassan, A., Ariffin, M., Hamid, A., Kamaruddin, M., Hassim, M.H., Abdul Aziz, A., & Helmi, S.A. A Review and Survey of Problem-based Learning Application in Engineering Education. Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp.14-15, (2004)

    [28] Corwin, Runyon, Robinson, & Dolan, D. The laboratory courses assessment survey: a tool to measure three dimensions of research-course design. Life Sciences Education, Vol. 14, pp.1-11, (2015)


    Citations

    APA:
    Kim, P.H. (2020). Suggestions for Lecture Assessment Items in College Settings. Journal of Education and Social Science (JESS), HolyKnight, vol. 1, 7-14. doi: 10.46410/jess.2020.1.1.02.

    MLA:
    Kim, Pyong Ho, et al “Suggestions for Lecture Assessment Items in College Settings.” Journal of Education and Social Science, HolyKnight, vol. 1, 2020, pp 7-14. JESS. https://holyknight.co.uk/journals/jess/vol1-2/

    IEEE:
    [1] Ahn, B., [1] Kim, P.H. “Suggestions for Lecture Assessment Items in College Settings.” Journal of Education and Social Science (JESS). HolyKnight, vol. 1, pp. 7-14. June 2020.